This has all been talked about before. I am just framing the concepts differently.

As first glance most people would say this is oil and water, but I don’t see it that way. Steps can be taken to bring model sharing closer to software and software closer to sharing. With the release of uber-builders and scripting in Matrix Version 6 I think Gemvision is taking a small step in this direction.

It makes for an interesting exercise if you ask these two questions:
1.) How can Internet Model Sharing be more like Jewelry Design Software?
2.) How can Internet Jewelry Design Software be more like Jewelry Design Software?

These can be small steps toward each other, but end I see a product that is a combination of both these services. Yes, I’m calling jewelry design software a service.

Steps to bring jewelry design software closer to model sharing:
1.) Making the final model more parametric. It’s finished, but it has handles all over the place to change it.
2.) Some 3D Art can be standardized, and directly injected into a builder. Such as:
Standard panels for class rings
Standard tops for signet rings, pendants, etc.
Collar sections of rings.
Really any element can be standardized, and then offered as an option.
2.5) You can build a model and the builder can cycle through the standard art available.
3.) Offering the design software in an Internet browser. Yes this is a jump, but standards and tech to make it happen are forming right now.
4.) Put a live human into the jewelry design software and offer this service live. No Joke. Yes, even I am dreading the day jewelry design software has an Indian accent. Cool, but scary! It’s called Artificial Artificial Intelligence.
5.) Offer community and collaboration tools directly inside of the software. A share my screen/model button. This would be a lot easier if the software was web based.

We do some of these steps already manually, but sometimes it can be done with a person that does not know CAD. Like a store employee or even a customer standing at a kiosk.

Step to bring model sharing closer to jewelry design software:
1.) Offering models that have parametrics already built into them. An example would be a model with the Matrix WIP 6 handles already in the model.
2.) Offer models that have the parametrics automated. Like you can play with the controls before you downloaded the model?
3.) Offer models that the standard 3D art can be changed on the fly, and seen in real time with the sharing interface.
4.) Offer manual changes to the models being shared. (We will resize this ring model for $xx.xx)

Reasons why you would want to marry the two concepts:
1.) Profits. This creates a new product category for the wholesale or retail customer. They can claim that they designed their jewelry.
2.) CAD designers can start with a model that is closer to the final design.
3.) This brings more people to the table. Most jewelry sales people do not work with CAD.
4.) It’s the Burger King business model. Have it your way. This gives the customer far more control over the model.
5.) These concepts create more ways to get the designer’s creative juices flowing.

This is all about building intelligence into the design of the model. The model has to be simple to allow this, but it can be done in many different ways.

I use Gemvision terminology here, but these concepts are already in use in other industries.

By the way artificial artificial intelligence is a really cool concept. I have not thought much about it for jewelry design. It’s all about humans interacting in complex ways with each other with complex software.

The convergence is coming!

What do you think?